
So you can read about my love of the school board in previous rants like
here:The short story is this. We were promised an elementary school right next to our house, it was finally built years late, now just sits there because the school board claims there are not enough students to fill it. Which is a total farce, overall enrollment in the district is dropping, but on our side of town it is increasing and all of our schools are way overcrowded and far, far away from our neighborhood.
So now our school is essenitally finished and it sits there empty. The school board has committed to opening it in 2006 as a kindergarten only, and then will add 1 grade each year. That is great for those of us who have young kids. But it sucks for people like my little friend Tanner. He starts kindergarten this year and he lives across the street from the school he will never go to, since he is one year behind. So for his entire elementary school career he will drive by a school full of kids in front of his house that he can't go to. Thanks a lot BJ Kline...(board prez)
We still have hope that when we get rid of this school board and elect a new one in november that we will be able to open the school fully in 2006. But now they are trying to pull another fast one on us.
At tomorrow's School Board meeting they are trying to sign a 3 year lease with a local community college to use the school. The deceptive part of this is that they are trying to push this through unnoticed in the 'consent calendar' portion of the agenda. This is basicly the approve without discussion section. It even says on the agenda,
"Items on the Consent Calendar are routine items expected to require no discussion and expected to have unanimous Board support."The problem with this lease is that it is a 3 year lease that is binding and can not be retracted. The lease is for one building of classrooms as well as the MPR. Now if you do the math, a 3 year lease will end in 2008. At that point the school will be at a minimum a K-1 school. The MPR is the cafeteria for the school. That means no assemblies for the students, no lunch etc.
It seems like another opportunity for this school board to prevent this school from opening. They have made it clear that they do not want to open it. I can see it now, a year from now we will be talking about opening the school and they will say we can't because they have this lease that they committed to...
So here is my letter I just wrote to the board. Can you tell i don't like them? It is the understanding of our community that at tomorrow night's meeting you are attempting to slip in a 3 year lease agreement with LRCCD in the consent calendar. It states in the agenda:
"Approval of Lease Agreement with Los Rios Community College District for the Use of a Classroom Building and Multipurpose Room at the Elementary School in Mace Ranch"
I understand your desire to use the facility, but i would like to remind you of your commitment to make MRE a school for our children. A three year lease of the MPR means there will be no or limited use of the MPR for our children. Even if that is only for a K-1 school starting in 2006.
That does not take into consideration that our community is still working toward having the school opened fully in 2006. We were promised an elementary school and we intend to get it as soon as possible.
Your past deceptions, lack of integrity, and lack of commitment to your word has greatly discouraged our community and has taught our children that commitment and honesty is not required to be a leader in a community. Here is a chance to redeem yourselves and stick to your word.
We understand the need to use the space, but urge you to only commit to a 1 year lease. Or make a 3 year lease, with the condition that it must be renewed at the beginning of each year. If you make a decision tomorrow to enter into a binding contract with any organization, you are once again slapping our children in the face.
Mace Ranch Parent
Brian Solecki